This dress has some possibilities for "commercial" production - minus the crap hanging down on the hem and adding some inches to the hemline.
The dress is - eh - but the look whoever gave to this model is grotesque. Please, is it really necessary to ugly up a woman in order to make a "statement" on the runway? And just what was the "statement," anyway?
My first thought upon looking at this image from Vogue.com was that the dress and look were created by a gay man designer who really really hates women, even if they are flat-chested with bad legs. Come on, blue lips? Is this some bizarre take-off on yesterday's "tribal" look? Oh please.
Turns out the designer is Mary Katranzou. Is Mary a real she or a convert? Guess it doesn't make much difference, either way, I think she hates women. If she liked women and if she was comfortable herself with being a woman, she would never put a female model in such make-up and she would not turn out tramp-trash for the runway.
No comments:
Post a Comment